#1 2010-10-29 22:17:06

SO NOW WHEN THE COMPUTER AUDIT DIDNT PROVIDE THE WIDESPREAD CORRUPTION THAT SLAGER PROMISED IT WOULD UNCOVER. IT DIDNT PROVIDE ONLINE GAMBLING WHICH SLAGER PROMISED TO UNCOVER. IT DIDNT PROVIDE LIBRARY CORRUPTION THAT SLAGER PROMISED IT WOULD UNCOVER GUESS WHAT HE SAYS NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!


LADIES AND GENTLEMAN IT WAS NEVER EVER ABOUT ALL OF THE THINGS IVE BEEN SAYING FOR OVER A YEAR. ITS ABOUT SOMETHING THAT I JUST MADE UP IN MY SICK LITTLE HEAD. AFTER READING SLAGER'S LATEST ARTICLE I NOW BELIEVE MORE THAN EVER THAT THIS GUY IS INSANE. HE TRULY IS A NUT CASE AND NEEDS TO BE INSTITUTIONALIZED.

Offline

 

#2 2010-10-29 22:36:53

Sit back and enjoy. Robert Slager's just confessed the $100,000 audit charade was an attempt to silence his critics.

http://warehamobserver.com/sidepic/bruceandboboaredone.png

Offline

 

#3 2010-10-29 23:58:36

Welllll, uhmmmmm, errrrrrr, okay?????

I can't wait until more damaging news comes out.....do you think his head will spin and he will spit pea soup?

I need an old priest and a young priest...the power of christ compells you...(repeat after me)

Offline

 

#4 2010-10-30 07:06:06

this guy slager IS A PHYSCOAND CRAZY ARE TAXES PAID FOR THIS CRAP NOT HIS AND I  WILL NOT VISIT ANY BUSINESSES THAT ADVERTISE IN HIS PAPER BECAUSE YOU MUST RUN A CRAPPEY BUSINESS IF YOU ASSOCIATE YOUR SELF WITH HIS LIES ,EMPLOYEES SHOULD NOT USE TOWN COMPUTORS WHILE AT WORK AND A SIMPLE SOLUTION FOR 2K WOULD HAVE STOOPED THIS PROBLEM ,BUT USEING A COMPUTOR ON COMPANY TIME IS A SERIOUS PROBLEM IN ALL BUSINESS , I GUESS THE EMPLOYEES IN THE TOWN HALL CLERKS DO NOT BLOG ON TOWN TIME  BECAUSE THERE COMPUTORS WERE NOT READ , .

Offline

 

#5 2010-10-30 07:53:40

IN RESPONSE TO SLAGER. IF THIS IS THE BEST YOU CAN DO AFTER NOTHING WAS FOUND ON AN AUDIT TO KEEP YOUR 5 READERS ENTERTAINED I FEEL SORRY FOR YOU. WHY WOULD YOU GO OUT OF YOUR WAY WEEK AFTER WEEK. CHAT AFTER CHAT TELLING HOW GREAT WIDESPREAD CORRUPTION WOULD BE REVEALED, LIBRARY CORRUPTION REVEALED, ONLINE GAMBLING ETC WITH THIS AUDIT IF ALL ALONG YOU KNEW NONE OF THIS WOULD COME OUT? SAVE IT SLAGER YOU NUT

Offline

 

#6 2010-10-30 08:16:23

I believe that WTF has contacts within the WPD like I believe pigs will fly over Onset Pier this afternoon.

If he has "contacts" at the WPD, they are not cops. They may claim to be, but they are a couple of kiss ass political wannabe's that love anyone in charge that loves them.

Bottom line: bullshit!

Offline

 

#7 2010-10-30 09:05:46

By the way..who is the "rogue" cop?

Dare we guess that it is Officer Pillsbury?

I only ask that because the WTF is obsessed with the family, and the vilification of the former Selectman Mary Jane Pillisbury.

If a rogue cop is one that has proven his ability to perform the job superbly while being constantly attacked for doing his job, a cop that ignores politics and concentrates on the law that he has sworn to uphold, a cop that has shown so much restraint while his late mother is dragged through the muck and mud of a yellow journalistic rag (he should receive a medal), a cop who continues to serve with dignity and competence, concentrating on protecting the citizens of Wareham, dedicated to the Town he serves, then I guess that cop would be Pillsbury.

I am very proud of Charles Pillsbury. He has conducted himself much better than I would have. If WTF went after my mother while I was a cop, especially in the "old" days, I would have made his life miserable and he would have left Wareham a long time ago. Too bad we can't bring back the "old" days, but we can't, and Charles knows that.

His restraint has been remarkable, and I have commended him many times for his conduct and dignity. His family must be very proud of him.

Too bad you don't have the balls to name him.

Offline

 

#8 2010-10-30 10:03:04

Your right dan if slager is so confidant in his sources why not reveal the name? Because slager knows he would be slapped with a defamation suit so fast his head would spin. Slager is a coward. He doesn't have the balls.

Offline

 

#9 2010-10-30 11:20:05

IHATESLAGER wrote:

Your right dan if slager is so confidant in his sources why not reveal the name? Because slager knows he would be slapped with a defamation suit so fast his head would spin. Slager is a coward. He doesn't have the balls.

Gentlemen and gentlewomen,  PLEASE stop the continued validation by bringing anything he and his "contributors" spew to this site.  He and his followers (believers) are not worth the toilet tissue he prints on.

Please restrain yourself.  With as many REAL concerns that exist in our community, he and his tabloid are not one of them.

Let him shrivel up and go away.

HAPPY HALLOWEEN !

Offline

 

#10 2010-10-30 11:25:47

danoconnell wrote:

I am very proud of Charles Pillsbury.

This town does not know what it owes that man. Bless you, Mr. Pillsbury and your entire family, for reminding us that 'Preserve and Protect' is not a punch line.

Offline

 

#11 2010-10-30 14:33:36

How does one respond to facts based on a fictional story???

Offline

 

#12 2010-10-30 15:31:28

The simple answer is, you do not respond. First, this is an editorial piece, which is an opinion piece. The use of undisclosed "sources" is a staple of his brand of tabloid writing. Nothing can be gained by arguing with an idiot. At best, you can say you won an argument with an idiot???

Keep in mind that the idiot is using misdirection to avoid explaining why all his outlandish claims have proven to be false. If something fails, start something new and ignore.

His audience is shrinking, his papers are plentiful because no one wants to read the rantings of an idiot, and his advertising dollars are shrinking even further.

Non-voter, non-resident.....non-factor.

Offline

 

#13 2010-10-30 17:06:58

IHS- You can not respond to a story that is based on lies.  You can not respond to a story that is based on alleged contacts.  ALL SLAGER DID WAS JUST ADMIT THAT HE, BRUCE AND THE BOS HAVE LIED ALL ALONG TO THE PUBLIC!!!!  The minute those disks were copied the supposed truth should have came out.  Do we all remember that Bruce and the Slager claimed this started because MAS was called a racial slur?  (BTW-it wasn't).  Do we remember all the allegations and promises coming from Slager through out all of this WITCH HUNT?  Remember - life changing, fine tooth comb talk?

So IHS, I suppose you can not prove his article is a joke.  He proved it himself!

The insinuations about the Pillsbury family is just as pathetic as Slager, Bruce and his cult are.  Prove something or shut up.  Ahhh, but you can't.  Thank you to the Pillsbury family.  You are what Wareham needs to keep in mind when talking about the greatness of Wareham!

Offline

 

#14 2010-10-30 17:07:03

Don't expect the Brainless Tin Hats to accept defeat gracefully.

They said the audit would reveal mass widespread corruption.  It revealed nothing.

They said the audit would reveal money laundering and thievery.  It revealed nothing.

They said the audit would reveal power elite conspiracies.  It revealed nothing.

They said the audit would reveal library corruption.  It revealed nothing.

They said the audit would reveal people using computers to run businesses on the town's dime.  It revealed nothing.

They said the audit would reveal everything from space alien invasions to who killed JFK.  It revealed nothing.

At least $60,000 (though $100,000 more likely)....and all we have to show for it are a few naughty pictures.

They're morons.  Idiots.  Scumbags, losers, liars, and pieces of shit.  Don't waste your time trying to get them to admit that they are liars, but find some peace in knowing that we've now reached the point where every decent person in town knows it.

Let's rally around good candidates  for next April who will throw these dirtbags out of office.  They've brought nothing but embarrassment and  humiliation on themselves, and Wareham will be able to get back on the right track when these lunatics are nowhere near any position that involves the slightest amount of power.

They've proven time and time again that they just can't handle it.

Be happy that they have so much egg on their faces - it covers up all the ugly.

Last edited by Hamatron5000 (2010-10-30 17:10:03)

Offline

 

#15 2010-10-30 17:20:06

File under..Bobo can't get anything right..(and it's on purpose)

The Halifax Fabricator wrote:

That’s why the computer audit was launched. It wasn’t about trying to find out if town employees were visiting Whitehouse’s web site...

Oh, yeah?? Just listen to Jane's first comment..

The Lying Assclown wrote:

...After Cronan suggested that Municipal Maintenance Director Mark Gifford’s lap top computer be audited..

Wrong again, Assclown..It wasn't Cronan...

Starting at the the 3:30 point of the audio..the following dialogue between Sanguinet and Sauvageau occurred..

Sanguinet: "..and the other two computer's we talked about..Gifford and Simmons.."
Sauvageau: "Yes"
Sanguinet: "You want those done, right?
Sauvageau: "...Why aren't they done??"
Sanguinet: "Because they didn't have the equipment to do Gifford's..ummm Thursday..and it's going to take too long to do Simmons."
Sauvageau: "Look, I mean..y'know..of course..Yes, we need them because we just said we don't want to hold out anybody in the initial..because it will look like..you know.."
Sanguinet: "OK"

Just listen..



TBW
P-SPAN

Offline

 

#16 2010-10-30 18:32:07

And notice he put this under"  in this corner" again. He said in his lawsuit that column is opinion not fact

Offline

 

#17 2010-10-30 18:39:03

Again slager if so confident in your sources reveal the person. I asked you first.  NO BALLS! let's see again its proven fictional because you lied about having results of an audit (remember the life changing impact buts that's all I can say right now) that showed NOTHING. NOTHING has happened with any of your fabrications ( library, water dept, computer audit) you name it NOTHING. AGAIN NO BALLS! PUT UP OR SHUT UP BALLESS WONDER

Offline

 

#18 2010-10-30 20:38:13

YES IN JOYCE'S LAWSUIT AGAINST YOU YOU CLAIMED THAT IN THIS CORNER WAS YOUR OPINION PIECE. AND YOU STILL HAVEN'T POSTED THE NAME YET. YOUR AVOIDING ANSWERING ME NO BALLS.


NO BALLS!!!

Offline

 

#19 2010-10-30 20:39:39

In the 1950's, McCarthy didn't debate his political opponents.  No, it was much easier to just accuse them of being communists.  If you dared to voice disagreement with him, you'd be branded a Communist.

The Tin Hats followed the McCarthy strategy to the letter.  They don't bother to debate.  No, it was much easier for them to accuse those who disagree with them of being part of a non-existant power elite conspiracy.

What utter fools they were to not realize this strategy put their political careers on borrowed time.  They were only able to scream ridiculous garbage about the audit revealing all kinds of evil deeds by their critics until the audit report was in.

Well, the audit report came in.  No vile power elite conspiracies found.  Just a few naughty pictures.

The clock has run out.  The audit has revealed nothing - nothing except that these people must be removed from any position of political power for the safety of Wareham to be ensured.   They've been exposed for the low life smear mongers that they are.

Let's rally around good candidates for April 2011 and put an end to this Nixonian Nightmare once and for all.

Last edited by Hamatron5000 (2010-10-30 20:42:02)

Offline

 

#20 2010-10-30 21:16:27

ONCE AGAIN NO BALLS GAVE NO ANSWER. NO BALLS. THAT'S ALL I CAN SAY RIGHT NOW

Offline

 

#21 2010-10-30 21:45:30

I think the best question to ask now is which two decent Wareham residents will step up and win the easiest selectmen's race in the history of Wareham, now that the Hypocrite Elite has been fully exposed once and for all for the frauds that they are?

Offline

 

#22 2010-10-30 21:53:43

Bobo is truly a loser with tiny crystal balls.

Last edited by Hamatron5000 (2010-10-30 21:56:19)

Offline

 

#23 2010-10-31 00:39:53

SOMETIMES I FORGET THAT NOT EVERYONE HAS ACCESS TO THE "NUTCHAT" BUT WANTED TO FILL EVERYONE IN THAT I HAVE ASKED AND ASKED SLAGER IF HE IS SO CONFIDENT IN HIS "SOURCES" THAT THIS STORY IS TRUE THEN WHY NOT IDENTIFY THE OFFICER? HE REFUSES TO ANSWER AND OBVIOUSLY WILL NOT BECAUSE HE HAS NO BALLS TO DO SO. THIS SPEAKS VOLUMES ABOUT THE VALIDITY OF THIS STORY. HE DANCES, DARTS, DODGES BACK AND FORTH AND WILL NOT ANSWER ME. AND WHEN DID SLAGER BITE HIS TONGUE ABOUT THIS FOR A YEAR? HE'S BEEN MAKING ALL KINDS OF WILD ACCUSATIONS THAT WOULD BE FOUND, BUT WAIT WHAT WAS FOUND ? NOTHING!!!! THE DISKS WERE COPIED A YEAR AND HALF AGO. NOTHING COULD CHANGE WHATS ON THE DISKS SO WHY BITE YOUR TONGUE? SO ONE MORE TIME NO BALLS WHY NOT IDENTIFY THE OFFICER WHO YOU IS INVOLVED IN THIS INVESTIGATION?

Offline

 

#24 2010-10-31 00:41:19

OH AND HAM HE SAYS HE WILL DEBATE YOU ANYWHERE / ANYTIME JUST BRINGS SNACKS FOR HIM.

AND SOME BALLS

Offline

 

#25 2010-10-31 09:09:31

Ham of Peace here.

Why would I debate someone who, due to the failure of the audit to produce anything, has proven himself to have the integrity of a pile of pigshit?

Offline

 

#26 2010-10-31 09:10:01

SLAGER MAKES UP INFORMANTS ,HE HAD AN INFORMAT AT THE LIBRARY AND HE HAS AN INFORMANT AT THE POLICE DEPT, HE MAKES THINGS UP AND ALL HE CAN SAY HE WANTS TO PROTECT THERE IDENITIES ,HE IS SUCH A LIAR,IN ANOTHER TIME IN THIS STATES HISTORY HE WOULD BE CONFINED TO THE TAUNTON NUT HOUSE BUT THEY LET THEM OUT AND NOW THIS NUT RUNS A PAPER, AND A DEBATE AND BRING THE SNACKS THIS GUY IS SUCH A FAT BASTARD HE DOES NOT NEED ANY SNACKS.

Offline

 

#27 2010-10-31 09:14:01

AND AS FAR AS ONLINE SHOPING DOES NOT ALL TOWN HALL EMPLOYEES PURCHASE THINGS FOR THE TOWN ONLINE LIKE SAY OFFICE SUPPLIES,ETC THUS BLOWING ONLINE SHOPPING OUT OF THE WATER .

Offline

 

#28 2010-10-31 09:16:06

ANDAS FAR AS PORN DID YOU EVER TYPE SOMETHING ON THE TOWNS COMPUTOR AND MISTYPE AND GET A PORN SITE ,ACIDENTS DO HAPPEN,.

Offline

 

#29 2010-10-31 09:17:42

He once again has come up with a story with zero facts based on un named sources. Maybe it was paul shooter

Offline

 

#30 2010-10-31 09:19:40

Anyone ever notice his "anonymous sources" always sound exactly like him?

Officer Paul Shooter and Officer Saul Pooter.

Offline

 

#31 2010-10-31 09:46:34

I am Hamatron5000.

Offline

 

#32 2010-10-31 09:53:11

Ham of Peace here.

Bobo, you should check time lines, because doing so would help your lying skills.

The audit began in May 2009.  The whole Crimewatch fracas didn't start till late July/early August 2009.

So you're saying the audit was really all about something that happened months after it started?

You're saying the town spent at least $53,000 to defend Grandpa Simpson's "honor"?

That the story you really want to go with?

You lost, Bagel Bitch.  You're a loser.  Get used to losing, because losers lose.  Learn how to lose gracefully.  Waddle off into the sunset and stop your whining.

Offline

 

#33 2010-10-31 11:57:01

When I was a kid when we wanted to find something out we would say, "Well someone told me you did x,y or z.  We were lying.  This is exactly what the fabricator has done.  This is how he continues to write.  He claims he has inside sources.  Prove it.  This would give him so much validity.  Ahhh, sorry had to take a break from laughing so damn hard at that thought.  Slager has NEVER backed up a story he has claimed happened upon hearing from one of his sources.  It is simply not true. 

Ham-you hit the nail on the head.  All Slager and his cult has done is accuse.  They can never back anything up.  Instead they just point fingers when someone doesn't agree with them and brand them with some name that is supposed to be evil. 

You can not sit down and debate with Slager.  First off between his beard and waistline you would  not be able to concentrate, but beyond that when asked to back up his allegations he will just say "I have my sources".   Bobo, answer IHS.  Can you???

Truth - look it up in the dictionary cult members.  Other than that you can all go to hell!

Offline

 

#34 2010-10-31 12:28:57

So, did all of the tin hats have TVS on the fritz this past Wednesday night? 

It's pretty hilarious, they're all whining and throwing temper tantrums, claiming the audit isn't over, that the "vile power elite conspiracies" will be revealed, that we didn't hear the whole audit, there's more audit...secret behind the scenes audits. 

Shitheads, if you forgot to tune in Weds night, let me recap for you.

THE AUDIT IS OVER AND YOU FOUND NOTHING!  YOU ARE MISERABLE LOSERS, FAILURES, AND BRING NOTHING BUT SHAME AND EMBARRASSMENT TO YOURSELVES AND TO THIS COMMUNITY!!!!

Oh well, what can you do?  Can't convince them that they're losers, but at least all of the decent people in town know they are losers.

150 years after the Civil War, there are still people in the South who say "The Confederacy shall rise again!"

Guess the tin hats will be whining years from now "The audit shall rise again!"

It's kind of enjoyable now to watch them have their little hissy fits.

Last edited by Hamatron5000 (2010-10-31 12:31:04)

Offline

 

#35 2010-10-31 14:46:39

IM NOT SURE HOW I CAN EXPLAIN THIS AGAIN TO BOBO BUT LETS TRY AGAIN. HIS ATTY IN THE JOYCE CASE ARGUED THAT HE COULD NOT BE HELD LIABLE BECAUSE THE JOYCE STORY WAS UNDER HIS COLUMN "IN THIS CORNER" WHICH IS AN OPINION COLUMN AND COULD NOT BE SUED FOR HIS "OPINION" BOBO WROTE THE LIBRARY STORY UNDER THIS AS WELL AS THIS "AUDIT" STORY. BOBO HAS JUST ACCUSED SOMEONE ON THE POLICE FORCE AS BEING A "ROGUE" COP AND HE SHOULD NAME THAT COP RIGHT NOW. WHY ? BECAUSE WHENEVER A MEMBER OF THIS COMMUNITY IS DEALING WITH A COP WILL THEY KNOW IF THEY ARE DEALING WITH THE "ROGUE" COP OR NOT. BOBO OWES THIS TO THE INNOCENT PEOPLE OF THIS COMMUNITY. DO IT SLAGER FOR THE COMMUNITY!

NO BALLS!

Offline

 

#36 2010-10-31 15:28:14

BOBO KEEPS ON SAYING HIS STORY HAS FACTS. WELL LETS SEE SLAGER HAS TWO UNNAMED SOURCES AND SLAGER'S WORD THAT ITS TRUE. THAT ADDS UP TO JACK SHIT.

Offline

 

#37 2010-10-31 15:42:56

Enough time has elapsed I can safely picture at least one of those unnamed sources.

http://warehamobserver.com/sidepic/andreasmith.png

Offline

 

#38 2010-10-31 15:46:57

DOES ANYONE HAVE ANOTHER PICTURE OF PAUL SHOOTER?

Offline

 

Board footer

warehamwater.com